![]() No matter how thorough we try to do it, there will always be someone who will say that it is biased. We don't see the point in spending time on such comparisons. We were accused by many of being biased, and told it was unfair to choose these projects for comparison. This resulted in two articles - a short and long variant. Our experience has shown us that such comparisons do more harm than good.įor example, we carried out a thorough comparison of PVS-Studio with Cppcheck, and Visual Studio SCA, in which we invested a lot of time and effort. It's not a problem to make one, but we have sworn off making such detailed comparisons again. ![]() To prove it, a simple table showing the comparison of the abilities won't be enough. That's why the programmers ask a reasonable question, "Is there a point in PVS-Studio, if we already have ReSharper?" ![]() However, ReSharper performs a wide variety of checks, and highlights suspicious code fragments. But it belongs to the category of 'productivity tools', and can not be called a static code analyzer in its classical meaning. Historically, ReSharper is known as the main tool for C# programmers. Recently, the analyzer obtained a new ability - to detect bugs in programs written in C#. PVS-Studio is a static code analyzer that detects errors in the source code written in C/C++.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |